A Resolution To Defend Billions of Lives: WE SAY NO TO PARIS COP21

The following resolution was released yesterday by the Schiller Institute, with the intention of rapidly collecting signatures from qualified professionals, political leaders, and ordinary citizens internationally. The main posting of the resolution can be found here, as well as the downloadable leaflet for signatures.

The conditions of life for billions of people depend upon rejecting the agenda being presented at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference to be held in Paris this December. The COP21 Paris initiative to adopt a legally binding agreement to reduce CO2 emissions must be rejected on two grounds: the scientific reality that mankind's activity is not going to cause catastrophic climate change, and the very real, lethal consequences of the CO2 reduction programs being demanded.

There is no legitimate basis for having the COP21 conference. Put an end to this now!

Despite the climate-change narrative being presented by an extremely well-funded, top-down propaganda campaign, there is an immense amount of solid scientific evidence which clearly contradicts and/or refutes the claims of coming catastrophic climate change caused by human emissions of greenhouse gases. For example, satellite measurements have shown that there has been no average rise in global temperatures for over 18 years, despite the fact that human greenhouse gas emissions have been increasing at an accelerating rate. This underscores the reality that the climate simply does not respond to CO2 levels in the way claimed by climate alarmists; said otherwise, the Earth's climate system is not highly sensitive to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

Because many climate models are using these false assumptions of high climate sensitivity to CO2, the predictions of these climate models have been consistently wrong, and with each year they are diverging further from reality. The gradual changes in the climate that have occurred over the recent decades, and the gradual changes which will continue to occur in the future, are not and will not be a cause for alarm. Most of these changes are natural, and any impact mankind may have would be relatively minor. A healthy and growing world economy will be able to adapt to these changes.

We must also recognize that CO2 is not a pollutant—it is an essential part of the biosphere. Because the present atmospheric CO2 levels are well below the optimum for plant growth, human-caused increases in CO2 concentrations are already contributing to increases in agricultural productivity and natural plant growth—creating a measurably greener planet.

But the Paris 2015 summit is not only about nations potentially wasting time and resources on a phantom problem existing only inside computer models—the ugly reality is that the CO2 reduction programs being proposed would increase poverty, lower living conditions, and accelerate death rates around the world. The world simply cannot support a growing population with improving conditions of life using only solar, wind, and other forms of so-called “green” energy.

More to the point, this scheme is being intensely promoted by modern followers of the population reduction ideology popularized by Thomas Malthus. Organizations such as the World Wildlife Fund/World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) have repeatedly declared that current human population is billions of individuals beyond the Earth's ”carrying capacity,” and must therefore be reduced by some billions of people. The present push for a CO2 reduction program is deeply rooted in this Malthusian ideological motivation. But Malthus was wrong in the Eighteenth Century, and his followers are wrong today.

Energy-intensive scientific, technological, and economic growth is essential to human existence. This can be measured by transitions to higher levels of energy flux-density, per capita and per area. Such progress, growth, and development is a universal right, and CO2 emissions are presently a vital part of that process for the overwhelming majority of the world's population. The adoption of a legally binding CO2 reduction scheme at the COP21 conference in Paris will condemn billions of people to a lower quality of life, with higher death rates, greater poverty, and no ability to exercise their inherent human right to participate in the creation of a better future for society as a whole.

This is deeply immoral.

For these reasons the CO2 reduction scheme of the COP21 conference in Paris must be rejected.

277 signatures

Will you sign?

  • rosa carral
    signed 2015-12-02 13:48:53 -0500
  • Salvador Manzano
    signed 2015-12-02 01:47:44 -0500
    Crystal clear!
  • bertrand gass
    signed 2015-12-01 17:02:47 -0500
    this propaganda is just disgusting
  • Marllon Rocco
    signed 2015-12-01 09:54:37 -0500
  • Rod Cass
    signed 2015-12-01 03:25:46 -0500
  • Rebecca Morrill
    signed via 2015-12-01 01:30:15 -0500
  • Jose Camaya
    posted about this on Facebook 2015-11-30 18:24:38 -0500
    Sign the petition: A Resolution To Defend Billions of Lives: WE SAY NO TO PARIS COP21
  • jose  fernando camaya
    signed 2015-11-30 18:21:32 -0500
  • Clovis Bombardelli
    signed 2015-11-30 18:14:14 -0500
  • Aubren Schneider
    signed 2015-11-30 17:45:50 -0500
    The Good Fight!
  • Paul Propert II
    signed 2015-11-30 15:09:42 -0500
  • curtiss smith
    signed 2015-11-30 13:32:09 -0500
  • David Dobrodt
    posted about this on Facebook 2015-11-30 11:21:11 -0500
    Sign the petition: A Resolution To Defend Billions of Lives:
  • David Dobrodt
    @BrotThe tweeted link to this page. 2015-11-30 11:21:08 -0500
    Sign the petition: A Resolution To Defend Billions of Lives:
    WE SAY NO TO PARIS COP21 http://larouchepac.nationbuilder.com/notocop21?recruiter_id=1193
  • Angelo Perone
    signed 2015-11-30 11:17:05 -0500
  • S K Smith
    signed 2015-11-30 11:05:19 -0500
  • Carlos Valdes Iii
    signed 2015-11-30 10:35:32 -0500
  • John Shevlin
    signed 2015-11-30 10:28:48 -0500
  • Ronni Blair
    signed 2015-11-29 21:52:44 -0500
    BE sure to see “Globalization is Genocide” by John Hoefle and Research how the Congress For Cultural Freedom engineers social movements and beliefs and imposes thought control using Tavistock methods. The EIR and the Schiller Institute were right about everything over 40 years.
  • Peggy Menzie
    signed 2015-11-29 18:24:00 -0500
  • edith kaman
    signed 2015-11-27 17:02:07 -0500
  • Daryl Bulych
    signed 2015-11-27 04:03:17 -0500
  • Terri Jackson
    signed 2015-11-26 13:02:23 -0500
  • Patrick Van Hoye
    signed 2015-11-26 09:15:56 -0500
    This ongoing hoax in a nutshell, well done.
  • Hugo Lagunas
    signed 2015-11-26 02:45:32 -0500
    No hay ninguna base legítima para tener la conferencia COP21. Poner fin a esto ahora!
  • stephen barclay
    signed 2015-11-25 16:10:27 -0500
  • Lynn Woolsey
    signed 2015-11-24 19:21:45 -0500
  • James Wood
    signed 2015-11-24 10:59:53 -0500
    While perhaps not appropos to this petition encouraging research (and production as possible) into alternative energy proposals going under the names of LENR, CANR, cold fusion, hydrino reactions, and the like should be encouraged. It is possible that the carbon reduction schemes can be made nugatory even if not directly overthrown.

    Still, overall, I think you are too optimistic that your British Empire or plutocracy can be put down without a real fight. What organized power is there to say no? If the Russians or the Chinese say no then war comes and presumably the victory for the plutocracy. Your fight is devilishly difficult for war is the natural response to serious rivalries. Yet here war in most any form means victory for the enemy. What is your strategy to undermine the plutocracy beyond attacking its various manifestations?

    When the U.S. Civil War came the beligerants had the organized political machinery of the states to provide muscle for their claims. The plutocracy has the established governments of the West in their corner. Is there any similar organizational might in the West against the plutocracy? No! Where can it come from? Can you drive the plutocracy from Washington short of civil war? If civil war, where would the conviction and determination and organizational ability come from? Would the army break up to follow the rebels? Would half of West Point go over? What really is your vision for the future? How can this fight be won?
  • Janko Proevski
    posted about this on Facebook 2015-11-24 09:41:02 -0500
    Sign the petition: A Resolution To Defend Billions of Lives:
  • janko proevski
    signed 2015-11-24 09:40:17 -0500

Donate Volunteer Get updates