Live Q&A Fireside Chat with Lyndon LaRouche, February 25, 2016, 9pm ET

 

Please submit questions in the Comment section below.  

To participate on the phone and ask your question personally, call (800) 929-7566 ahead of time.

For technical help, email: daviddobrodt@lpac-organizers.com 


Share the event, help build the audience!

Will you come?

Showing 28 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Scott Maddox
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:48 -0500
  • Tj Hall
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:46 -0500
  • eleni loykatos
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:46 -0500
  • Claudio Marty
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:45 -0500
  • Donna Turney
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:44 -0500
  • Anthony Wicher
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:43 -0500
  • Kari Ilonummi
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:42 -0500
  • Theodore Andromidas
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:41 -0500
  • Ralph Coffman
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:40 -0500
  • Michael Irving Wgft
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:37 -0500
  • Helen Smirnova
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:36 -0500
  • Brandon Swoboda
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:36 -0500
  • wayne thomas Baker
    rsvped 2016-02-26 01:43:34 -0500
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 21:56:18 -0500
    Another question has come in from a supporter on the Presidential Campagin: Mr. LaRouche What will the effects on the US Presidential Campain be if Hillary Clinton were to be put under indictment at some point? Also what if the worst of the worst former NY Mayor Bloomberg jumps in to the race as a third Party candidate? Thanks.
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 21:49:50 -0500
    Another question on the Presidential Campagn . Mr. LaRouche, I note that Jeb Bush has dropped out of the Presidential race. My question is was the fact that Donald Trump was talking about 9/11 and suggesting that the Saudis and George W Bush were responsible, did this successfully “scare” Jeb Bush to drop out of the race for fear that his families role in 9/11 would come out? Thanks.
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 21:45:58 -0500
    A number of the supporters have sent in questions on the Presidential Campagin and 9/11 and the lack of action by Congress on the Bills in the Senate and the House to declassify the 28 pages One question is: Mr. LaRouche, I think it is definitely time for Bernie Sanders or any of the other Presidential candiates who are elected officials now to follow in the footstops of former Senator Mike Gravel and read or discuss the contents of the 28 pages on the floow of the Congress .. Do you think that this is possible for Sanders or anyone else to do??
  • Alan Blanes
    commented 2016-02-25 21:37:14 -0500
    I am wondering if the LaRouche PAC has any ideas on restoring rule of law in the investment industry – it is in my view time to get the common law of contract and the criminal code put as the first tools in regulation through the industry controlled tribunals. The SRO self regulating commissions and councils are destroying the equal protection under the law – especially to vulnerable seniors who can be lied to with impunity by brokers.
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 21:26:02 -0500
    A question from Jean E. in California. Mr. LaRouche, I just met with my Congressman face to face . He told me to my face that he supports Glass Steagall, He told me EVERYBODY supports Glass Steagall. But he doesn’t seem to really get it cause HE AND THE OTHERS DONT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT! My question is why doesn’t it ever seem to sink in to the Congress they actually have to do something about the crash of the financial system?? Thanks. I am tired of repeating myself over and over and over and over.
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 21:07:27 -0500
    A question has come from Richard VB in Minnesota, Mr. LaRouche I recently retired from working more than 45 years in the transportation industry in the U.S. dealing with both automotive and trucking situations, and I am wondering how you see the situtaion, in light of the wonderful news about the ceasefire in Syria brokered by the US, Russia, and China and the obvious need for a Marshall Plan to rebuild the infrastructure of Syria, my thoughts come back to here in the United States, how can we move on the urgent need to rebuild the infrasture and mnaufacturing here in the United Sates and I include most definitely the full restoration of the NASA Space Program? Thanks
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 20:37:59 -0500
    Here is a statement and question from Anthony Wicher in Lake Arrowhead, California, He writes,

    " I just wrote out the following five points. I would like to see them discussed:
    1. The Syria cease fire agreement represents a golden opportunity for international cooperation.
    2. The cease-fire will not hold unless it is quickly followed by international agreements on the physical economic development of the whole area. Only this can bring lasting peace. The Chinese New Silk Road policy is a golden opportunity for such development.
    3. If the United States joins Russia and China in this New Silk road project or Marshall Plan for the Middle East, it can spell the end of the British imperial system which has been dominating U.S. foreign and domestic policy more and more since the death of FDR, replacing it with an international New Deal.
    4. The Syrian cease fire agreement shows that war avoidance forces are currently in ascendency in the Obama administration. We must do everything possible to support those forces and oppose the war party forces. That means we should support President Obama as long as the Obama administration continues on the path of peace and cooperation, just as Putin is doing. It is not a matter of personally supporting Obama but of supporting the peace process and keeping Obama on board with it. Calls to Congress are in order praising the cease fire and bringing in the idea of joining the Russians and the Chinese in an economic development program.
    5. As long as the cease fire holds, Obama should not be targeted. We should treat him as a lame duck. Instead we should look forward to November and to getting these New Deal programs adopted by the next administration. The only candidate running whose supporters are progressive and susceptible to the idea of an international New Deal is Bernie Sanders. Nobody else in either party is even thinkable as a vehicle for our ideas. Therefore we must go all out to support his candidacy and to introduce our advanced ideas to his supporters. They must hear about the New Silk Road becoming the World Land Bridge. The Sanders campaign already supports Glass-Steagall. Now it must adopt our plan for the economic development of the United States as outlined in our pamphlet “The United States Joins the New Silk Road”. Sanders supporters are our natural audience. His campaign must become a vehicle to spread our ideas." Lyn, can you comment on this?
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 19:56:58 -0500
    A question has come in from Patrick in Nevada.
    He asks, Mr. LaRouche, I was able to watch most of the excellent speech this morning made by the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, in the US at the Georgetown Center for Strategic Studies in Washington DC.
    He called for and welcomed US particpation in the One Road, One Belt policy and called this WIN WIN COOPERATION for the United States AND China both.
    He definitely sounded the same call for cooperation that I have heard from you and your wife, Helga Zepp. LaRouche. He even talked about avoiding the Thrucydides Trap, that there was no reason the US and China should not be fully cooperating for the benefit of both.
    My question is how does China see the wish for that relationship to actually occur as long as Obama is still in office?? Will they committ fully to that cooperation as long as the current situation of threats against China with Obama still being in office remain??
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    commented 2016-02-25 19:47:16 -0500
    A question from Ken M. in Western Canada… Mr. LaRouche, there seem to be 2 different governments representing the US. One has signed the agreement with Russia and worked with China to implement the cease-fire in Syria and to enforce it and make it a reality. The other US government people like Sec. of Defense Ash Carter and CIA Director Brennan have attacked the Russians, threaten the Chinese and are calling for new measures to "inflict pain on the Russians. My question is how can the public understand which of these two totally different outlooks is really speaking for THE US Government and where does Obama fit or not fit into this picture? Thanks, Ken
  • wayne thomas Baker
    commented 2016-02-25 19:22:20 -0500
    Mr. LaRouche good evening. Sect John Kerry presents a challenge to me as i find it somewhat hard to read between the lines of what he says. I am assuming he finds himself in a very tough but interesting position. Obama/war on one side and Russia,China/ World Land Bridge on the other. Could it now be the case that Kerry and others is starting to understand that Putin is morally fit and the plan to rebuild humanity is already in motion with the New Silk Road ?
  • Arman Vaziri
    rsvped 2016-02-25 00:43:32 -0500
  • Jakub Mirek
    rsvped 2016-02-25 00:43:31 -0500
  • Joyce Wingo
    rsvped 2016-02-25 00:43:29 -0500
  • Patrick O'Malley
    rsvped 2016-02-25 00:43:28 -0500
  • Gerald Pechenuk
    rsvped 2016-02-24 15:38:24 -0500

connect