Live Q&A Fireside Chat with Will Wertz, July 21, 2016, 9pm EDT
Please submit questions in the Comment section below.
To participate on the phone and ask your question personally, call (800) 929-7566 ahead of time.
For technical help, email: daviddobrodt@lpac-organizers.com
Share the event, help build the audience!
Showing 18 reactions
Sign in with
or
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Katherine Notley followed this page
2016-07-22 02:32:51 -0400
Wayne Baker commented
2016-07-21 19:07:50 -0400
The recent developement of having Glass Steagall included in the platforms of both parties is really a surprise of sorts, especially with the Republicans decision. It is of great significance as Wall Street spent billions to bury it and keep it buried. The inclusion of GS is a recognition of the problem that was supposed to be unspoken of. Does this have the muscle to convince Germany to embrace Herrhausen or at least send a signal that there are relevant voices in the US now ready and willing to deal with the collapse?
Wayne Baker rsvped
2016-07-21 18:55:24 -0400
Lawrence Henni commented
2016-07-21 17:56:08 -0400
In an article It’s Time to Bring the War On Terror Down on the British Empire
July 21, 2016, published on larouchepac.com, it says “In the United States, Wall Street, an arm of the British financial empire, has woken up to the fact that there is a full-blown revolt against their corruption and thievery. It has immediately taken the form of the inclusion of a call to reinstate Glass-Steagall in the platforms of both the Republican and Democratic parties, something that Wall Street never saw coming.” Both republican and democratic platforms have capitulated or been somewhat in the pocket of the British Empire and cannot be taken off the burner. Elected representatives have an obligation, a sacred duty, entrusted by the people whom have given the “right of representation” to make public policy in the best interest of all the people in the private sector they represent, regardless of who owns or possesses more money.
Lawrence Henni commented
2016-07-21 17:55:45 -0400
How many U.S. DOLLARUNITS have been issued, are in circulation and are on the books in documentation? Is the amount of U.S. DOLLARUNITS, of which whomever has documented lawful or legal ownership and possession of these currency units and all associated activities and assets enforced and protected by respective varying specific public and private police, security and military jurisdictions establishments, roughly $3 Quadrillion? Is the total amount of real physical value in the Trans Atlantic or U.S. DOLLARFEDERALRESERVESYSTEM, measured in U.S. DOLLARUNITS, roughly $400 Trillion? Would the total amount of legitimate derivative DOLLAR value, to regulate the value of currency ARTICLE 1 SECTION 8, be roughly $400 Trillion? If so, then who will lawfully and legally own or possess the legitamate derivatives while the other estimated $2.2 Quadrillion is junked, dissolved and written off? And, would respective varying specific public and private jurisdictional entities have natural rights to regulating the values of the currency used in planetary commerce or economy?
Lawrence Henni commented
2016-07-21 17:11:01 -0400
How many U.S. DOLLARUNITS have been issued, are in circulation and are on the books in documentation? Is the amount of U.S. DOLLARUNITS, of which whomever has documented lawful or legal ownership and possession of these currency units and all associated activities and assets enforced and protected by respective varying specific public and private police, security and military jurisdictions establishments, roughly $3 Quadrillion? Is the total amount of real physical value in the Trans Atlantic or U.S. DOLLARFEDERALRESERVESYSTEM, measured in U.S. DOLLARUNITS, roughly $400 Trillion? Would the total amount of legitimate derivative DOLLAR value, to regulate the value of currency ARTICLES 1 SECTION 8, be roughly $400 Trillion? If so, then who will lawfully and legally own or possess the legitamate derivatives while the other estimated $2.2 Quadrillion is junked, dissolved and written off? And, would respective varying specific public and private jurisdictional entities have natural rights to regulating the values of the currency used in planetary commerce or economy?
Liliana Gorini rsvped
2016-07-21 00:07:54 -0400
Jack Medeiros rsvped
2016-07-21 00:07:52 -0400
Maria Channon rsvped
2016-07-21 00:07:51 -0400
Cynthia Chung rsvped
2016-07-21 00:07:48 -0400
Arman Vaziri rsvped
2016-07-20 00:08:39 -0400
Anna Kumor rsvped
2016-07-20 00:08:38 -0400
Charles Stevens rsvped
2016-07-20 00:08:35 -0400
Ali Razeghi rsvped
2016-07-19 00:08:26 -0400
Avneet Thapar Hall rsvped
2016-07-19 00:08:24 -0400
Showing 18 reactions
Sign in with
July 21, 2016, published on larouchepac.com, it says “In the United States, Wall Street, an arm of the British financial empire, has woken up to the fact that there is a full-blown revolt against their corruption and thievery. It has immediately taken the form of the inclusion of a call to reinstate Glass-Steagall in the platforms of both the Republican and Democratic parties, something that Wall Street never saw coming.” Both republican and democratic platforms have capitulated or been somewhat in the pocket of the British Empire and cannot be taken off the burner. Elected representatives have an obligation, a sacred duty, entrusted by the people whom have given the “right of representation” to make public policy in the best interest of all the people in the private sector they represent, regardless of who owns or possesses more money.